ISSN: 0964-0282 (print) • ISSN: 1469-8676 (online) • 4 issues per year
This paper explores gender in stand‐up comedy based on 20 months of ethnographic research in Finland and recent media discussion involving the booking of performers for a national comedy tour. As the vast majority of stand‐up comedians are men, discussions of gender tend to focus on the anomalousness of female comedians. These debates often rely on essentialist views of women and stand‐up comedy, presenting female comedians as transgressive due to the perceived incompatibilities of women and comedy. However, the situation in the clubs and performances is more complex. I chart this territory by looking at gender in relation to ‘invention’ and ‘convention’ in stand‐up comedy performance. I explore how some of the conventional, established and expected aspects of stand‐up, such as the public use of power and threat of failure, are related to ideas of gender. I then go on to show how comedy enables invention, new and/or unique ideas and forms. This allows comedians to approach and enact gender in more digressive ways: taking indirect, experimental paths and imaginatively shifting between perspectives and positions to subvert and question roles and patterns. As stand‐up becomes more diverse, discussing gender requires a more nuanced approach going beyond a simple binary.
The concept of isolation has dogged anthropological studies of rural Ireland. This paper re‐conceptualises isolation through ethnographic work undertaken on the minibuses run by Rural Transport projects in five counties of Ireland. Instead of seeing isolation as an embedded characteristic of Irish landscapes, histories or of the ageing body, the paper describes dynamic, shifting expectations of belonging and community. On the Rural Transport buses, characteristic moments of witnessing ‘figures in the landscape’ during predictable and routinised journeys produce strikingly new negotiations of alterity and sameness among the passengers. The paper argues for the significance of these moments in developing a socialised, inscribed landscape and new senses of generative agency.
This essay aims to rethink the epistemological study of violence among the Yanomami's Venezuelan and Brazilian world. In doing so, I reopen some of the discussions between Marshall Sahlins and Napoleon Chagnon/National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in the context of the much longer debate about ‘innate aggressiveness’ (as virtue or vice) as it came to be revived in the context of the Cold War, decolonisation and the protests against the Vietnam War.
This article looks at the way people tactically adjust to contexts of insecurity and danger. Building on fieldwork with disenfranchised urban poor in West Africa and marginal West African migrants in Europe, it clarifies how perspectives and practices are attuned to precarious situations and life conditions. The article argues that the struggle to identify threats leads to a nervous sociality in which figures and social forces are examined for hidden intentions and negative potentials. Such circumstances engender an apprehensive bearing, as an affective state, posture and approach, through which social life is sought, investigated and controlled. It augments perceptivity and leads to a scanning and probing of social life that feeds into a social version of the hermeneutics of suspicion and generates a range of pre‐emptive practices.
As a tactic of cognitive self‐awareness, the reciprocity of perspectives is not so much a subjective metric for intercultural comparison as it is an internalised property of human sentience, which I label as a subject/object shift: the transposition of ends and means. Understood most broadly as a universal application of the double proportional comparison, made famous by Claude Lévi‐Strauss as the canonical formula for myth, the reciprocity of perspectives, instead of opposing the innate and the artificial (e.g. ‘nature’ and ‘culture’) to one another, presupposes a reciprocal, self‐contradiction between the two. I examine the self‐transformative and tactical character of the reciprocity of perspectives and its effects on language itself, which ceases to be an instrument of communication and takes on the role of communicator or persuader – that of the user rather than the tool.
This essay puts Michel de Certeau's work on tactics in conversation with the work of F. G. Bailey on tactical subjects and Roy Wagner's work on alliance. In doing so, my objective is to introduce the notion of the association as an essential aspect of a contemporary anthropological theory of tactics. I approach the notion of association from three angles: as an ethnographic object and political entity, as an anthropological analytical tool and as a pragmatic, political gesture. By analysing associations from these three interrelated perspectives, I attempt to shift attention away from understandings of tactics as having to do with spontaneous creativity, cunning and reversal of power. Instead, I showcase that the deployment of tactics demands the setting up and maintenance of a tactical infrastructure of alliance, capable of making the future and pre‐emptive deployment of tactics possible.
How can anthropologists negotiate access in high‐profile, bureaucratic apparatuses, such as a UN human rights monitoring mechanism – and what can a detailed account of these negotiations tell us of such apparatuses, their operational dynamics and the processes through which they exert an impact, broadly construed? This article addresses these questions through the notion of tactical subjectivity by anchoring its discussion on the category of the intern and detailing how this category became informative of the ‘fuzzy logic’ of the UN apparatus. The article outlines three techniques mobilised in the process – name‐dropping, ‘playing blonde’ and opportunism – all embedded in a tactical matrix of exaggerated transparency. The article further shares attempts to flesh out relations and thus form ‘liaisons’ between my interlocutors and myself at sessions of the UN Human Rights Committee, the most influential of all the UN treaty bodies overseeing how states comply with their covenant‐bound obligations. The ultimate aim was to become a conspicuous ethnographer with constant access – a volatile goal in the unpredictable microstructures of this awesome global apparatus.
This special section proposes that an ethnographic and conceptual emphasis on tactics can contribute to anthropological understandings of thinking, acting and being in the world. Although they can be perceived as intrinsic tenets of human sociality and subjectivity, tactical thinking and doing are becoming important parts of socio‐political landscapes around the world. Approaching the notion of tactics ethnographically demands highlighting how and why tactical sociality and subjectivity emerge in everyday life. Granting ethnographic attention to tactical practices of people can aid in showcasing how such practices do not merely strive to fulfil a certain outcome, but rather attempt to reinforce awareness of one's, often uncertain, structural position in a social, political or legal apparatus. In addition, a conceptual emphasis on tactics can provide a useful analytic lens in rethinking notions of relationality, agency, structure and method as these are contained in already existing anthropological concepts, such as habitus, access, alliance, subjectivity and uncertainty. By ethnographically and conceptually exploring tactical sociality and subjectivity as they become implicated in everyday contexts and situations, the articles in this section aim to provide a contemporary anthropological perspective of tactics.