Home eBooks Open Access Journals
Home
Subscribe: Articles RSS Feed Get New Issue Alerts
Browse Archive

Social Anthropology

Anthropologie sociale

ISSN: 0964-0282 (print) • ISSN: 1469-8676 (online) • 4 issues per year

Volume 17 Issue 2

What is happening to the anthropological monograph? Live Debate at the EASA conference in Ljubljana 2008 Introduction

Helena Wulff

What is happening to the anthropological monograph? (The onslaught of the journal article)

Don Handelman

Academic publishing

Marion Berghahn

Commentary I

Virginia R. Dominguez

Commentary II

Brian Moeran

Human natures

Philippe Descola

edited by Astuti, Rita, Jonathan Parry and Charles Stafford

JOËL NORET

by Khuri, Fuad I.

CÉDRIC BAYLOCQ SASSOUBRE

by McCloud, Aminah Beverly

MARIA SIX‐HOHENBALKEN

by Moore, Lisa Jane

CAROLINE HIRT

edited by Portes, Alejandro and Josh DeWind

MAŠA MIKOLA

(2nd edn) by Rapport, Nigel and Joanna Overing

ANNE SIGFRID GRØNSETH

edited by Corsín Jiménez, Alberto

EYAL BEN‐ARI

by Day, Sophie

ÀGI FÖLDHAZI

by Fontein, Joost

DAN UNGUREANU

edited by Goulet, Jean‐Guy A. and Bruce Granville Miller

DAVID ANDERSON

edited by Grant, Bruce and Lale Yalçın‐Heckmann

DAVID GULLETTE

by Gregg, Gary S.

SAMULI SCHIELKE

by Jackson, Michael.

NIGEL RAPPORT

by Johnson, Paul Christopher

MARA A. LEICHTMAN

Art and anthropology

Claudia Hucke

What Shapiro and McKinnon are all about, and why kinship still needs anthropologists

Robert Parkin

The article takes the form of a critical comment on Warren Shapiro's recent defence of approaches to kinship from evolutionary psychology against Susan McKinnon's attact on them from a position of cultural constructivism, but it also takes issue with some of McKinnon's own arguments, as well as reflecting critically on the assumptions of evolutionary psychology itself. Although far apart theoretically, Shapiro and McKinnon share a flawed understanding of the significance of kin term equations, while McKinnon and evolutionary psychology both rely in their arguments on notions of agency that are fundamentally ethnocentric and neglect the significance of social obligation. Nonetheless, Shapiro and McKinnon both represent established tendencies within social anthropology, though not exhaustively so. The article ends with a plea for a degree of reconciliation between these tendencies (echoing Janet Carsten), if only to defend them from often ill‐informed interventions in this area from other disciplines.

Is charity a gift? Northern Irish supporters of Christian missions overseas

Elizabeth Tonkin

In Northern Ireland, as elsewhere in the British Isles, mainline church denominations support their own mission societies. A small study of their attitudes and objectives was conducted with society officials, and with leading supporters in different denominations. Working in solidarity with others in their congregation, supporters were often more interested in helping to relieve suffering than to learn about the cultures and politics of the ‘missionised’. The sociality and disinterestedness of such charitable activities is contrary to some common assumptions about Western individualistic giving, deserves anthropological analysis and is relatable to Maussian theories of ‘the gift’.

Writing Europe

A dialogue of ‘liminal Europeans’

Máiréad Nic Craith

Migration has been a regular feature in Europe since before the Romans. However, an acceleration of this process in the 20th and 21st centuries has resulted in the breaking down of old affinities and alignments and the emergence of new formations that challenge traditional group definitions. Many Europeans experience strong senses of exclusion from the mainstream society to which they have migrated. Some have explored this challenge of liminality in writing. The essay focuses on auto/ethnographies that have been penned in a liminal context with particular reference to the concept of Europe. How do migrants translate their own memories and stories from one region of Europe into a new cultural setting? What is the composite picture of Europe that is created in these migrant writings and how significant is the experience of liminality?

Materialising ethnicity

Commodity fetishism and symbolic re‐creation of objects among the Gabor Roma (Romania)

Péter Berta

The study deals with the prestige economy of a Transylvanian Roma ethnic subgroup known as the Gabors. It highlights how these Roma construct prestige items and symbols of ethnic identity by de‐ and re‐contextualisation, that is, by commodity fetishism and symbolic re‐creation of silver beakers and tankards purchased from non‐Roma antique dealers, auction houses, museums etc. Focusing on a transitional period of the ‘social history’ of these objects, it analyses how the Gabors attach to them a new cultural identity (elite register of consumption of material goods) and new social identities (symbols of ethnic and patrilineal identity). These processes of ‘symbolic alchemy’ of objects play a significant role in the construction and materialisation of ethnic identity among the Gabors.

Notes toward a cultural construction of modern foods

Sidney Mintz

The creation of a scientifically pure sweetness was a historical process comparable to the standardisation of cooking oil or salt. But the case of sugar is almost unique. Today, quite different processes, concerned more with marketing than with chemistry, serve to elaborate, multiply and reshuffle products. These have the common objective of enlarging the aggregate market. They play upon taste, class aspiration and otherwise, to diversify the market in terms of class, ethnicity, and other criteria of social assortment, by inflecting the products themselves. Here I argue that two different meanings of the term ‘purity’ are popular, and that both are used to broaden and to deepen consumption.