PDF issue available for purchase
Print issue available for purchase
ISSN: 1934-9688 (print) • ISSN: 1934-9696 (online) • 3 issues per year
A theory of comic timing in contemporary slapstick films based on the incongruity theory of humor is put forward. Comic timing is defined as
This article focuses on
This article covers the neurobiological and psychological aspects of horror movies. Cinema audiences are not exposed to real threats, thus the movie should pass the brain's “reality check” systems and emotion regulation to engage the fear responses. This is achieved through vicarious simulation, proximity of threats, and unpredictability of the fearful events, and using universal sources of fear such as illness or isolation. Paradoxical appeal of horror movies stems from universal curiosity toward morbid and threatening subjects, mixing of emotions of fear and excitement in the brain, and the capability to learn about dangerous situations safely in the context of movies. These findings are summarized in a conceptual model for eliciting fear through cinema.
Since its introduction in 1976, the rhetoric surrounding Steadicam has emphasized the embodied nature of the technology. This article tests these claims against scholarly work on visual conventions as well as on embodiment and the related concept of Image Schemas as coined by Maarten Coëgnarts and Peter Kravanja. I will link both these approaches to the underlying idea of contingent human universals and how these undergird visual conventions. I will also turn to the field of evolutionary biology and epigenetic inheritance to add a (evolutionary) biological lens to these concepts. In doing so, I will argue for Steadicam's very special relationship with embodied camera movement and the specific new visual conventions it instigated.
David Bordwell,
Lucy Fischer.
Steffen Hven.
Timothy Corrigan, ed.