ISSN: 1755-2923 (print) • ISSN: 1755-2931 (online) • 2 issues per year
Published Open Access as part of the Berghahn Open Anthro collection.
Get 35% discount when you checkout 3 or more PDF articles. This special issue on anthropology and literature invited proposals for
original contributions focusing on relationships between anthropology
and literature. We were especially interested in the following questions:
what role does literature play in anthropology? Can literature be considered
as ethnography? What are the relationships between anthropology
and literature, past and present? Are anthropology and
anthropological motives used in literature? We also looked for critical
readings of writers as anthropologists and critical readings of anthropologists
as writers. Moreover, we wanted to assess the influence of
literature on the invention of traditions, rituals and cultural performances.
All these different questions and topics are clearly connected
with the study of literacy, illiteracy and popular culture. They also lead
to questions regarding potential textual strategies for ethnography and
the possibilities of bringing together the field of anthropology (more
associated with the social sciences) and literary studies (traditionally
part of the humanities). George Orwell is most widely known as the teller of dystopian tales
of oppression. A closer look at his oeuvre reveals a courageous truth
seeker who frequently lived and worked with his literary subjects. In
his fieldwork he used the methods of classic ethnography including
participant observation, semi-structured interviews and field notes.
This article argues that Orwell was an ethnographer in his research
methods and that both Down and Out in Paris and London and The Road
to Wigan Pier are ethnographic texts with valuable insights into marginal
groups in the early to mid-twentieth century in Europe. The
writer’s clear-sighted and humane depiction of ‘otherness’ shows his
skill as an ethnographer. His personal investment with his subject
matter, reflexivity and attention to broader social and political phenomena
in his narratives mark Orwell as an autoethnographer. Mid-nineteenth-century Russian ethnography used fiction, artistry
and education to enlighten the masses. Maksimov’s One Year in the
North became one of the first examples of this new style of ethnography.
Maksimov constructs ‘cultural masks’ regarding northern people
(Samoyeds, Lapps, Karels, Zyrians). His impressions are developed
out of long traditions and personal characterisations, such as: ‘little
brothers’, blacksmiths, tricksters, ‘friends of deer and dogs’. The most
interesting positions on his ‘evolutionary ladder’ are the first and the
last, which belong to the Samoyeds and the Zyrians. Samoyeds find
themselves partly outside the human space, but they are most diverse
in the aspect of artistry. Zyrians, on the other hand, constitute a concern
to their well-being. Maksimov’s biases are typical for this period
of ethnographic development. Although Maksimov appreciates the
spoken word, his colonial discourse replaced it by repulsion for Finno-
Ugric languages. Artistry in the text of ‘ethnographic fiction’ enriches
scientific discourse. Anthropology and anthropological literature have had an irreversible
effect on the practice of contemporary shamanism. In this small-scale
study, I look at the complex ways the literature has been recorded,
initiated interest, revived and verified the shamanic practices. Over
the years, anthropologists have also caused distortions in revived
practices as they have left some things unrecorded. On the basis of
written responses and interviews from shamanic practitioners and
active drumming-group members, I demonstrate that the argument
of neo-shamanism as the only form of shamanism still alive is not
completely true. Attention is drawn also to the claim about the cycle
of learning in contemporary shamanism. My argument is that the
main part of learning in the deeper levels of shamanic practices still
happens in face-to-face situations. The aim of this study is to bring the feast of San Vicente Ferrer in
the city of Valencia closer to our knowledge. This festivity serves as
a good example of how literature created by local folk writers is
transformed into a street performance. At the same time it is one of
the best examples of contemporary popular religiosity in this region
of Spain. On the day of the celebration, actors perform short plays
on the streets of the city. The shows are based on the life of the
patron of the city and are written by local authors. The feast has a
long history – the oldest altar was set in la calle del Mar in the mid-fifteenth
century – and the celebrations continue into the twenty-first
century with well-organised associations. These entities are an element
of the utmost importance for the neighbourhood. They both
preserve traditional Valencian customs and this region’s own language,
and have an important role in shaping social relationships
within the community. In this article we present the ongoing theoretical discussions concerning
the relations between anthropology and literature in France.
We recall the historical relationship of a part of French anthropology
and the world of literature. We then try to show how the anthropology
of literature began by using the model of the anthropology of
art, mainly concentrating on literary works as individual creations
specific to the style or the cosmology of a given writer. We explore a
new perspective on the analysis of the social and symbolic meanings
of literary worlds, putting the emphasis on what is called ‘ethnocriticism’
in France. In order to understand better the influence of literature
and literary motives on contemporary cultural practices, and
to grasp the relation of literary works with the outside world and with
everyday life, we propose to build up a comparative approach of literary
works and rituals. Through different novels or other literary
works, we address possible developments of contemporary anthropologies
of literature in France. The present article investigates the concept of kurtijo, roughly ‘courtyard’,
‘home’, in Judeo-Spanish (known also as Ladino, Djudezmo or
Sephardi), the language of Sephardic Jews, currently under threat of
extinction (Harris 1994, 2011). It argues that after the Holocaust kurtijo
became a culturally salient word and it may be regarded as a cultural
key word in Ladino. Dictionaries and texts of contemporary
Ladino poets will be used as the main source of data. The meaning
of kurtijo will be expressed in the form of an NSM explication (Goddard
and Wierzbicka 2002, 2014). The article aims to show how ethnographic data concerning religious
rites, both Catholic and pagan, circulate in culture and thus
become a kind of historical source for re-enacting other, invented
religious rites. In the example of the Rękawka fair in Cracow, it is
demonstrated how religious content present in nineteenth-century
ethnographic descriptions, originally ascribed to pre-Christian paganism
but incorporated into a Catholic fair, was separated from it and
used in recreating and performing a neopagan rite. Investigating an
Early Middle Ages re-enactment movement, the author focuses on
the process of transforming ethnographic data into historical ones.
Analysing the problem of authenticity of such sources, she points
out the particularities of achieving authenticity in a re-enactment
movement: to some, the contemporary Rękawka fair remains only a
kind of historical re-enactment, while according to others it is a true
neopagan rite. Alessandro Testa (2014), Il carnevale dell’uomo-animale: Le dimensioni storiche e socio-culturali di una festa appenninica (Napoli: Loffredo), 610 pp., Pb: €34.50, ISBN: 978-8-875-64675-2.Volume 25 Issue 1